Effects of Kinematic Constraints on Teleseismic Finite-Source Rupture Inversions: Great Peruvian Earthquakes of 23 June 2001 and

Effects of Kinematic Constraints on Teleseismic Finite-Source Rupture Inversions: Great Peruvian Earthquakes of 23 June 2001 and 15 August 2007 Maps showing the slip distribution for the preferred doublet event models for the 2007 (top) and 2001 (bottom) Peru earthquakes. The slip region for the first event in each pair is indicated by the orange tones. The stars indicate the USGS epicenters and the blue circles indicate the CMT centroid.
<p>
The rupture processes of two great under-thrusting earthquakes along the coast of Peru in 2001 and 2007 involve slip distributions that are distinctive from the pre
dominantly unilateral or bilateral rupture expansion of many great events. Commonly used finite-source rupture model inversion parameterizations, with specified rupture velocity and/or short duration of slip at each grid point, applied to the seismic recordings for these two events lead to incorrect slip-distributions or inaccurate estimation of rupture velocities as a result of intrinsic kinematic constraints imposed on the model slip distributions. Guided by large aperture array back-projections of teleseismic broadband P-wave signals that image slip locations without imposing a priori kinematic constraints on the rupture process, we exploit the availability of large global broadband body and surface wave data sets to consider the effects of varying the kinematic constraints in teleseismic finite-source waveform inversions. By allowing longer than usual rupture durations at each point on the fault using a flexible subfault source time function parameterization, we find that the anomalous attributes of the 2001 and 2007 Peru earthquake ruptures are readily recognized and accounted for by compound rupture models. The great 23 June 2001 (Mw = 8.4) earthquake involved an initial modest-size event that appears to have triggered a much larger secondary event about 120 km away that developed an overall slip distribution with significant slip located back along the megathrust in the vicinity of the initial rupture. The great 15 August 2007 (Mw = 8.0) earthquake was also a composite event, with a modest size initial rupture followed by a 60 sec delayed larger rupture that initiated ~50-60 km away and spread up-dip and bilaterally. When back-projections indicate greater rupture complexity than captured in simple slip-pulse-type rupture model, one should allow for possible long-subfault-slip-duration or composite triggered sequences, and not overly constrain the earthquake slip distribution.
</p><p>
Acknowledgements: Supported by NSF grants EAR0453884 and EAR0635570 (TL) and USGS Award Number 05HQGR0174 (CJA).</p>

Comments

No comments yet.

  •  

Welcome

Welcome to the IRIS Image Gallery – a diverse collection of photographs and visuals that encompass the range and breadth of seismology and the seismological community.

Please browse through our albums. These low and medium-resolution images can be freely used for personal and educational/academic purposes, but we request you recognize the image contributor by including in your product or presentation the credit displayed with each image.

More information is available in the Image Use Agreement.

If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions related to the IRIS Image Gallery, you can send them to gallery@iris.edu.

Photo info

Popular tags